In Task 4 you look at the same picture from Task 3 and say what you think will happen next. You have 30 seconds to prepare and 60 seconds to speak.
Some practice prompts on CELPIPReady continue the Task 3 scene, and others describe a new situation and ask what changes it will bring. In both cases you need to make clear predictions and explain why they are likely.
Prepare: 30 seconds. Speak: 60 seconds.
These are the 3 free Task 4 prompts on CELPIPReady. Each sample answer was written by CELPIPReady to show what a response can sound like at a target level. They are not official CELPIP answers or scores.
Look at the same picture from the previous task. Predict what will happen at this farmers market over the next few hours. Talk about how the crowd, the vendors, and the atmosphere are likely to change as the morning continues.
No sample answer for this prompt yet. Record your own response in the free practice.
A city announces that it will ban all gas-powered vehicles from its downtown core starting in five years, allowing only electric vehicles and public transit. What changes do you predict this will cause for residents, businesses, and city infrastructure?
I think this ban will cause big changes in the city. First, residents will need to buy electric cars, which might be expensive at first. Businesses downtown will face problems because delivery trucks and taxis need to change too. The city will have to build more charging stations everywhere. I think some people will be happy because the air will be cleaner and there will be less pollution. However, some business owners will worry about losing customers because it might be harder to park and deliver goods. Public transit will probably get more riders, so the city will need more buses and trains. Overall, I believe this change will be difficult at first, but it will be good for the environment in the long run.
I predict this ban will bring significant changes across several areas. For residents, the transition will likely be challenging since many will need to invest in electric vehicles, which remain expensive. However, over five years, battery prices should decrease, making adoption more feasible. Businesses will face considerable challenges, particularly those relying on vehicle deliveries. I think the city will need to establish designated delivery zones and expand its charging infrastructure substantially. Moreover, public transportation usage will probably increase dramatically, which means the city should invest in expanding bus and metro services. The environment will definitely benefit from reduced emissions and improved air quality. That said, some retailers downtown might initially lose customers if parking and access become difficult. On the positive side, property values may increase due to cleaner air and less traffic congestion. This policy will require careful planning to balance environmental goals with economic concerns.
I anticipate this initiative will precipitate a multifaceted transformation across urban systems. For residents, the five-year timeline presents a realistic but demanding adjustment period. While early adoption costs will undoubtedly deter many, the proliferation of affordable EV models and potential government subsidies should incentivize gradual transition. I suspect businesses will experience the most acute disruption initially—logistics companies will need to overhaul their fleets, and delivery systems will require substantial reconfiguration. However, this challenge could catalyze innovation in urban logistics, potentially spurring investment in micro-mobility solutions and consolidated delivery hubs. The city's infrastructure demands will be considerable: charging networks must expand exponentially, grid capacity needs reinforcement, and parking requirements will likely decrease as vehicle ownership diminishes. Regarding public transit, ridership will presumably surge dramatically, necessitating substantial capital investment in frequency and coverage expansion. Interestingly, this policy could trigger gentrification pressures as cleaner neighborhoods become increasingly desirable. While short-term economic friction is inevitable, I believe the long-term benefits—improved air quality, reduced noise pollution, enhanced public health outcomes, and potentially lower transportation costs per capita—will substantially outweigh initial disruptions.
A major Canadian city announces it will build a new light rail transit line connecting the suburbs to downtown, with construction starting in 18 months. What changes do you predict this will bring to the neighborhoods along the route over the next 10 years?
I think the new light rail will bring big changes to the neighborhoods. First, more people will move there because it's easier to get downtown. This means more houses and apartments will be built. Second, there will be more shops and restaurants near the stations because more people will live there. Third, property prices will probably go up because everyone wants to live near the transit. However, there might be some problems too. During construction, there will be noise and traffic for 18 months, so some people might leave. Also, rent will become more expensive, so poorer people might have to move away. Overall, I think the neighborhoods will become busier and more developed, but they'll also change a lot.
I believe this light rail project will significantly transform the neighborhoods in several ways. Initially, we'll likely see increased property values because accessibility to downtown will improve dramatically. This'll attract real estate developers and investors to the area. Consequently, new residential buildings and commercial spaces will emerge, particularly around the transit stations. Moreover, local businesses will probably thrive as foot traffic increases and the community becomes more vibrant. However, there are potential downsides to consider. During the 18-month construction period, residents will face disruptions from noise, dust, and traffic congestion, which might cause some temporary population decline. Additionally, as the areas become more desirable, gentrification could occur, pushing out long-time residents who can't afford rising rents and property taxes. Despite these challenges, I think the neighborhoods will ultimately become more economically dynamic, though they'll inevitably lose some of their original character and affordability.
I'd anticipate this light rail initiative will catalyze profound demographic and economic transformation along the corridor. The enhanced connectivity will inevitably spur speculative real estate investment, driving property values upward and triggering a wave of intensified development. We'll probably witness a shift toward mixed-use developments, with retail and office spaces complementing residential units, creating more self-sufficient neighborhoods. This accessibility premium will likely attract younger professionals and families seeking convenient urban-suburban living. That said, there's a paradoxical risk of accelerated gentrification. As neighborhoods become increasingly coveted, socioeconomic displacement may occur, displacing vulnerable populations who've historically inhabited these areas. The construction phase itself—spanning 18 months—will generate temporary friction: traffic congestion, noise pollution, and business disruption that could temporarily depress local economies. Furthermore, if transit-oriented development isn't managed thoughtfully, we might see homogenization rather than authentic community development. Ultimately, the neighborhoods' trajectories will heavily depend on municipal planning policies. With strategic interventions like affordable housing requirements and community engagement, these areas could become genuinely inclusive, economically vibrant hubs. Without such oversight, they'll likely experience classic gentrification patterns, becoming prosperous yet socially fragmented.
Based on this scenario, I predict several things will happen. First and foremost, [prediction 1]. This is likely because [reasoning]. Additionally, I think [prediction 2]. This could lead to [consequence]. In the long term, [prediction 3]. However, there might also be [alternative outcome]. Overall, I believe the most significant impact will be [summary].
New to the test? Read the CELPIP Speaking practice overview or browse all Speaking practice.
CELPIP Speaking Task 4 (Making Predictions) gives you 30 seconds to prepare and 60 seconds to speak. Your response is recorded on the computer and the recording stops when the time ends.
No. CELPIPReady wrote these sample answers to show what a response can sound like at each target level. They are not official CELPIP answers, and the CLB labels are targets, not scores from a CELPIP rater.
Yes. The first 3 Task 4 prompts on CELPIPReady are free, with a timer and sample answers. With a free account you also get a few AI feedback scores each week.
CELPIP® is a registered trademark of Paragon Testing Enterprises. CELPIPReady is an independent study platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Paragon Testing Enterprises.